FlashFish E200 or EcoFlow DELTA 3: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
FlashFish E200
Main drawback151 Wh leaves limited energy and requires prioritising
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
EcoFlow DELTA 3
Main drawbackContinuous heavy loads soon use up the available energy
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”EcoFlow DELTA 3 8 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Battery capacity”EcoFlow DELTA 3 7.9 / 10 vs 6.6
- Priority: “Weight”FlashFish E200 9.3 / 10 vs 7.8
- Priority: “Number of 230 V sockets”EcoFlow DELTA 3 9.3 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Equipment”EcoFlow DELTA 3 9 / 10 vs 7
By criterion
| Criterion | FlashFish E200 | EcoFlow DELTA 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 6.7 | 8 advantage |
| Battery capacity | 6.6 | 7.9 advantage |
| Weight | 9.3 advantage | 7.8 |
| Number of 230 V sockets | 6.9 | 9.3 advantage |
| Equipment | 7 | 9 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | FlashFish E200 | EcoFlow DELTA 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 200 W | 1800 W |
| Battery capacity | 151 Wh | 1024 Wh |
| Weight | 1,85 kg | 12,5 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not specified (unverified) | Not provided |
| Maximum solar input power | 40 W | 500 W |
| Number of 230 V sockets | 1 sockets | 4 sockets |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
Values taken from the specifications table in each analysis; “Not provided”: no value found. “unverified”: among the 5 essential specifications (Rated power, Battery capacity, Weight, Number of 230 V sockets, Mains charging time), a value found online that no verified source (archived retailer page or manufacturer documentation) confirms. Other rows are not subject to this check.
Which is right for you?
FlashFish E200
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Weight: 9.3/10 vs 7.8/10 (1,85 kg vs 12,5 kg)
EcoFlow DELTA 3
Leads on 4 criteria of 5 compared
- Number of 230 V sockets: 9.3/10 vs 6.9/10 (4 sockets vs 1 sockets)
- Equipment: 9/10 vs 7/10
- Battery capacity: 7.9/10 vs 6.6/10 (1024 Wh vs 151 Wh)
- Rated power: 8/10 vs 6.7/10 (1800 W vs 200 W)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, FlashFish E200 or EcoFlow DELTA 3?
EcoFlow DELTA 3 scores 8.4/10, compared with 7.3/10 for FlashFish E200, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Number of 230 V sockets”?
EcoFlow DELTA 3 wins on “Number of 230 V sockets”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.9/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 4 sockets versus 1 sockets.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
EcoFlow DELTA 3 wins on “Equipment”: 9/10 compared with 7/10 for FlashFish E200.
Which wins on “Weight”?
FlashFish E200 wins on “Weight”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.8/10 for EcoFlow DELTA 3. Recorded values: 1,85 kg versus 12,5 kg.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
EcoFlow DELTA 3 wins on “Battery capacity”: 7.9/10 compared with 6.6/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 1024 Wh versus 151 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
EcoFlow DELTA 3 wins on “Rated power”: 8/10 compared with 6.7/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 1800 W versus 200 W.