Head to head

Ampace Andes 1500 or EcoFlow DELTA 3: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Ampace Andes 1500, studio product shot

Ampace Andes 1500

7.9/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackShorter runtime as power consumption increases

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
EcoFlow DELTA 3, studio product shot

EcoFlow DELTA 3

8.4/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackContinuous heavy loads soon use up the available energy

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Rated power”Ampace Andes 1500 8.8 / 10 vs 8
  • Priority: “Battery capacity”Ampace Andes 1500 8.4 / 10 vs 7.9
  • Priority: “Equipment”EcoFlow DELTA 3 9 / 10 vs 6.6

By criterion

Comparison of Ampace Andes 1500 and EcoFlow DELTA 3 by criterion
Criterion Ampace Andes 1500 EcoFlow DELTA 3
Rated power 8.8 advantage 8
Battery capacity 8.4 advantage 7.9
Equipment 6.6 9 advantage

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Ampace Andes 1500 and EcoFlow DELTA 3
SpecificationAmpace Andes 1500EcoFlow DELTA 3
Rated power2400 W1800 W
Battery capacity1462 Wh1024 Wh
WeightNot provided12,5 kg
Maximum solar input powerNot provided500 W
Number of 230 V socketsNot provided4 sockets
UseHome backupMotorhome
Battery technologyLiFePO4LiFePO4
Expansion batteryCompatibility not specifiedCompatible with an expansion battery

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

Ampace Andes 1500

Leads on 2 criteria of 3 compared

  • Rated power: 8.8/10 vs 8/10 (2400 W vs 1800 W)
  • Battery capacity: 8.4/10 vs 7.9/10 (1462 Wh vs 1024 Wh)
View Ampace Andes 1500 →

EcoFlow DELTA 3

Leads on 1 criterion of 3 compared

  • Equipment: 9/10 vs 6.6/10
View EcoFlow DELTA 3 →

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Ampace Andes 1500 or EcoFlow DELTA 3?

EcoFlow DELTA 3 scores 8.4/10, compared with 7.9/10 for Ampace Andes 1500, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

EcoFlow DELTA 3 wins on “Equipment”: 9/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Ampace Andes 1500.

Which wins on “Rated power”?

Ampace Andes 1500 wins on “Rated power”: 8.8/10 compared with 8/10 for EcoFlow DELTA 3. Recorded values: 2400 W versus 1800 W.

Which wins on “Battery capacity”?

Ampace Andes 1500 wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.9/10 for EcoFlow DELTA 3. Recorded values: 1462 Wh versus 1024 Wh.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it