Head to head

VTOMAN Jump 2200 or AFERIY P310: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

VTOMAN Jump 2200, studio product shot

VTOMAN Jump 2200

8/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackA heavy carry between the vehicle and your pitch

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
AFERIY P310, studio product shot

AFERIY P310

8.8/10
Overall rating

Main drawback42 kg makes loading into a vehicle a serious lift

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Rated power”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 8.5
  • Priority: “Battery capacity”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 8.5
  • Priority: “Weight”VTOMAN Jump 2200 7.6 / 10 vs 6.8
  • Priority: “Equipment”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 7.5

By criterion

Comparison of VTOMAN Jump 2200 and AFERIY P310 by criterion
Criterion VTOMAN Jump 2200 AFERIY P310
Rated power 8.5 9.5 advantage
Battery capacity 8.5 9.5 advantage
Weight 7.6 advantage 6.8
Equipment 7.5 9.5 advantage

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for VTOMAN Jump 2200 and AFERIY P310
SpecificationVTOMAN Jump 2200AFERIY P310
Rated power2200 W3600 W
Battery capacity1548 Wh3840 Wh
Weight17,4 kg42 kg
Maximum solar input powerNot provided2000 W
Total power of included solar panels0 WNot provided
Number of 230 V socketsNot provided3 sockets
SolarSolar charging compatibleSolar charging compatible
UseMotorhomeMotorhome
Expansion batteryCompatible with an expansion batteryCompatible with an expansion battery
Non-USB DC outputs12 V cigarette lighter socket12 V cigarette lighter socket

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

VTOMAN Jump 2200

Leads on 1 criterion of 4 compared

  • Weight: 7.6/10 vs 6.8/10 (17,4 kg vs 42 kg)
View VTOMAN Jump 2200 →

AFERIY P310

Leads on 3 criteria of 4 compared

  • Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 7.5/10
  • Rated power: 9.5/10 vs 8.5/10 (3600 W vs 2200 W)
  • Battery capacity: 9.5/10 vs 8.5/10 (3840 Wh vs 1548 Wh)
View AFERIY P310 →

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, VTOMAN Jump 2200 or AFERIY P310?

AFERIY P310 scores 8.8/10, compared with 8/10 for VTOMAN Jump 2200, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

AFERIY P310 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for VTOMAN Jump 2200.

Which wins on “Rated power”?

AFERIY P310 wins on “Rated power”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.5/10 for VTOMAN Jump 2200. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 2200 W.

Which wins on “Battery capacity”?

AFERIY P310 wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.5/10 for VTOMAN Jump 2200. Recorded values: 3840 Wh versus 1548 Wh.

Which wins on “Weight”?

VTOMAN Jump 2200 wins on “Weight”: 7.6/10 compared with 6.8/10 for AFERIY P310. Recorded values: 17,4 kg versus 42 kg.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it